← Search

Christina Jemison

Lancaster, PA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
52 matches · 27W–25L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Christina Jemison to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history52 matches
L
2026-08-20 · Lancaster CC - Gingrich/Zechman · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kathryn Brandt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-04 · Lancaster CC - Gingrich/Zechman · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-06-30 · Lancaster CC - Ganse/Jemison · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-4
W
2026-06-11 · Lancaster CC - Gingrich/Zechman · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Stacey Brubaker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-2
W
2026-06-04 · Lancaster CC - Gingrich/Zechman · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jill Stoltzfoos
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-06-02 · Lancaster CC - Ganse/Jemison · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-05-07 · Lancaster CC - Ganse/Jemison · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-02-26 · Lanc CC - Gingrich / Zechman · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kelley Greiner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6
L
2026-01-22 · Lanc CC - Gingrich / Zechman · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Stacey Brubaker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2025-11-19 · Lanc CC - Shand / Chambers · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Tara Kinney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
W
2025-10-29 · Lanc CC - Shand / Chambers · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Stacey Brubaker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-4
L
2025-10-18 · Lanc CC - Lefever · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Katherine Fulton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams19 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
2.5
64.3%
9W–5L · 53.9% of games
3.0
63.6%
7W–4L · 59.8% of games
5.0
56.2%
9W–7L · 54.1% of games
6.0
20%
2W–8L · 35.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 40% of the time
#1 Doubles
40%
21 matches
#3 Doubles
29%
15 matches
#2 Doubles
15%
8 matches
#1 Singles
8%
4 matches
#2 Singles
6%
3 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert