← Search

Joe Neylan

Raleigh, NC
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
154 matches · 108W–46L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Joe Neylan to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history154 matches
W
2026-09-10 · Be.Koren40C · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Brian Maher
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-08-20 · Be.Koren40C · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Scott Russell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-3
W
2026-07-22 · Te.Sherburne18M · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tiffany Barrier mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-22 · Te.Sherburne18M · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Joanna Brooks mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-09 · Te.Sherburne18M · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Joanna Brooks mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 5-7, 0-1
L
2026-05-19 · #1 Doubles · with Matthew Horney championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-05-10 · Ad.Dailey18A · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Matthew Horney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-05-03 · Ad.Dailey18A · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Scott Underwood
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 7-6
W
2026-04-29 · Te.Sherburne40A · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Matthew Horney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-04-19 · Ad.Dailey18A · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Matthew Horney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 1-6, 1-0
W
N/A
2026-04-16 · Gr.Kash40A · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Scott Underwood
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-04-15 · Te.Sherburne40A · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Matthew Horney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams33 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.5
76%
19W–6L · 64% of games
4.0
69.7%
23W–10L · 55.6% of games
4.5
60%
3W–2L · 59.7% of games
7.5
91.7%
11W–1L · 62.6% of games
8.5
76%
19W–6L · 67.6% of games
4.0mixed
33.3%
4W–8L · 50% of games
7.0mixed
100%
9W–0L · 70.7% of games
8.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 45% of the time
#1 Doubles
45%
69 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
51 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
33 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer