← Search

Natalie Gorman

— year-end
78 matches · 45W–33L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Natalie Gorman to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history78 matches
W
2026-08-27 · Kurin-Kushmaul/Bentonville/MRC · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Katherine Wetzel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-0
L
2026-08-06 · Trout/Bentonville/KTC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Courtney Kleinebreil
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-03 · Trout/Bentonville/KTC · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Courtney Kleinebreil
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
L
2026-07-29 · Abdin/Fayetteville/FAC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Javier Cordero mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-07-13 · Smith-Kushmaul/Rogers/Matrix · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Steven Smith mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 0-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-12 · Abdin/Fayetteville/FAC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with William Hartle mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 2-6
L
2026-07-09 · Smith-Kushmaul/Rogers/Matrix · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Steven Smith mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-30 · Smith-Kushmaul/Rogers/Matrix · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Drew Smith mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-06-22 · Smith-Kushmaul/Rogers/Matrix · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Steven Smith mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-05-04 · Tarnasky/Springdale/FAC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lauren Shillcutt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 4-6
W
2026-05-03 · Anderson/Rogers/MRC · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-05-02 · Tarnasky/Springdale/FAC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Natalie Anderson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-1
Teams44 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
3.0
62.5%
10W–6L · 64.8% of games
3.5
70.8%
17W–7L · 57.7% of games
4.0
25%
3W–9L · 33.7% of games
5.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
6.5
100%
5W–0L · 64.4% of games
7.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
66.7%
6W–3L · 59.6% of games
4.0mixed
20%
1W–4L · 39.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 35% of the time
#2 Doubles
35%
27 matches
#1 Doubles
26%
20 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
18 matches
#1 Singles
9%
7 matches
#2 Singles
8%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Pressure is a privilege.
Billie Jean King