← Search

Michelle Kehoe

— year-end
72 matches · 47W–25L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Michelle Kehoe to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history72 matches
W
2026-09-03 · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Sherry Fitzgerald
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-08-30 · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Sherry Fitzgerald
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-08-05 · Hultquist/Rogers/SVCC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Melanie Neal
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-07-23 · Hultquist/Rogers/SVCC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Haley Maxwell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-6
L
2026-07-21 · Neal/Rogers/SVCC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Luke Momo mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 5-7
W
Stephanie Johnson / James Carter
2026-07-14 · Warner/Rogers/SVCC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jeff Tomblin mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-7, 1-0
W
Natalie Gorman / Steven Smith
2026-07-09 · Neal/Rogers/SVCC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Luke Momo mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-06-26 · Warner/Rogers/SVCC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jeff Tomblin mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-22 · Hultquist/Rogers/SVCC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Allison Harker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-18 · Neal/Rogers/SVCC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Luke Momo mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 5-7
W
2026-06-17 · Hultquist/Rogers/SVCC · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Haley Maxwell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-05-31 · Hultquist/Rogers/SVCC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Melanie Neal
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
Teams41 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
61.1%
22W–14L · 56.2% of games
4.0
54.5%
6W–5L · 49.5% of games
4.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.5
100%
5W–0L · 76.9% of games
7.5
100%
8W–0L · 70.6% of games
3.5mixed
45.5%
5W–6L · 50.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 36% of the time
#1 Doubles
36%
26 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
20 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
16 matches
#1 Singles
10%
7 matches
#2 Singles
3%
2 matches
#3 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer