Mandy Lanham
65 matches · 47W–18L · seasons 2024–2027
Captains: add Mandy Lanham to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.
Match history65 matches
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-0
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 1-6, 1-0
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
Teams42 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
89.5%
17W–2L · 66.7% of games
3.5
63.2%
24W–14L · 56.5% of games
6.5
75%
6W–2L · 62.9% of games
Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.
By lineusually #3 Doubles, 31% of the time
#3 Doubles
31%
20 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
16 matches
#1 Doubles
22%
14 matches
#1 Singles
9%
6 matches
#4 Doubles
8%
5 matches
#2 Singles
6%
4 matches
How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.
Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.