← Search

Leigh Terrell

— year-end
72 matches · 35W–37L · seasons 2024–2027

Captains: add Leigh Terrell to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history72 matches
L
Mary Moore / Mandy Lanham
2026-09-01 · MTC - Lamar/Terrell · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kim Pugh
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-18 · MTC - Lamar/Terrell · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rosa Lamar
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W
Hagan Anderson / Jennifer Graham
2026-07-23 · MTC - Lamar/Terrell · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Laura Brand
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-07-07 · MTC - Lamar/Terrell · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Rosa Lamar
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-06-25 · MTC - Lamar/Terrell · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Rosa Lamar
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 7-6
L
2026-06-08 · MTC - Lamar/Terrell · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Lauren Wilson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-04-21 · MTC - Lamar/Terrell · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rosa Lamar
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-04-20 · MTC - Eways · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-04-01 · MTC - Lamar/Terrell · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kathy Clark
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
W
2026-03-26 · MTC - Eways · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Colleen Comer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
W
2026-03-23 · MTC - Eways · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Colleen Comer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-03-10 · MTC - Lamar/Terrell · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Colleen Comer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
Teams28 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
55.3%
21W–17L · 47.9% of games
3.5
37.5%
9W–15L · 45.8% of games
5.5
50%
2W–2L · 47.8% of games
6.5
50%
3W–3L · 49.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 32% of the time
#1 Doubles
32%
23 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
21 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
10 matches
#2 Singles
13%
9 matches
#1 Singles
10%
7 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal