← Search

Natica Smith

— year-end
107 matches · 56W–51L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Natica Smith to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history107 matches
L
2026-06-18 · FOR THE LOVE OF THE GAME · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Stevie Josey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-10 · Causing a Racquet · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lisa Prince
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-06-05 · FOR THE LOVE OF THE GAME · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Tayra Ward
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-28 · FOR THE LOVE OF THE GAME · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Adisha Tamrakar
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
L
2026-05-20 · Causing a Racquet · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kimerlee Conner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-05-06 · Causing a Racquet · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-04-16 · FOR THE LOVE OF THE GAME · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Mallory Marlin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-04-15 · Causing a Racquet · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Megan Lister
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-04-02 · FOR THE LOVE OF THE GAME · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Adisha Tamrakar
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2025-10-15 · Team Beast Oracle · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
L
2025-10-01 · Team Beast Oracle · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jacqualine Bufford
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-7, 0-1
W
2025-09-24 · Team Beast Oracle · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jacqualine Bufford
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
Teams26 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
2.5
75%
3W–1L · 58% of games
3.0
51.9%
14W–13L · 49% of games
3.5
53.3%
8W–7L · 50.2% of games
4.0
51.4%
19W–18L · 49.9% of games
4.5
20%
1W–4L · 28.2% of games
7.0
46.2%
6W–7L · 46.7% of games
8.0
83.3%
5W–1L · 60.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 22% of the time
#1 Doubles
22%
24 matches
#1 Singles
21%
22 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
22 matches
#2 Doubles
19%
20 matches
#2 Singles
16%
17 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams