← Search

Amber Price

Edmond, OK
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
123 matches · 58W–65L · seasons 2020–2027

Captains: add Amber Price to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history123 matches
W
2026-09-09 · Brooks · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jenni Fosbenner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
W
2026-08-17 · Tri Me a River · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Kourtney Aller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-08-12 · Tri Me a River · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Jenni Fosbenner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-03 · Tri Me a River · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Tessa Cook
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-29 · Tri Me a River · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Alison Morris
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-06 · Tri Me a River · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Jenni Fosbenner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 7-6
L
2026-06-10 · Mid Court Crisis · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lisa Shaver
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-7, 0-1
L
2026-05-06 · Mid Court Crisis · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jamie Wells
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-04-29 · Mid Court Crisis · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lisa Shaver
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-6
W
2026-04-23 · No Strings Attached · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cindy Hendrick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-04-15 · Mid Court Crisis · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lisa Shaver
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-04-10 · No Strings Attached · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Laura McNew
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams35 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
2.5
53.8%
7W–6L · 50.6% of games
3.0
20%
1W–4L · 43.3% of games
3.5
64.9%
24W–13L · 54.8% of games
4.0
28.8%
15W–37L · 43.7% of games
7.0
73.3%
11W–4L · 56% of games
8.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 41% of the time
#2 Doubles
41%
50 matches
#1 Doubles
29%
36 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
31 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
4 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams