← Search

Brooke Bogert

Oklahoma City, OK
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
111 matches · 88W–23L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Brooke Bogert to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history111 matches
L
2026-08-17 · Bogert · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kaitlyn Browning
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 1-6
L
2026-08-05 · Bogert · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kaitlyn Browning
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-08-03 · Bogert · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lacy Remy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
W
2026-07-29 · Bogert · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lacy Remy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-07-27 · Bogert · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kaitlyn Browning
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-22 · Bogert · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kaitlyn Browning
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-15 · Bogert · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kaitlyn Browning
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-07-13 · Bogert · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Manar Landis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
L
2026-07-08 · Bogert · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kaitlyn Browning
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-17 · Betty's · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Whitney Rainbolt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-06-10 · Betty's · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lisa Mullen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-05-13 · Betty's · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jessica Crowder
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams31 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
2.5
85%
34W–6L · 68% of games
3.0
74.1%
20W–7L · 59.5% of games
3.5
100%
11W–0L · 70.7% of games
4.0
72.2%
13W–5L · 56.6% of games
7.0
62.5%
5W–3L · 60.1% of games
8.0
71.4%
5W–2L · 57.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 39% of the time
#1 Doubles
39%
43 matches
#1 Singles
25%
28 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
24 matches
#3 Doubles
9%
10 matches
#2 Singles
5%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe