← Search

Nicholas Shaffer

— year-end
109 matches · 53W–56L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Nicholas Shaffer to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history109 matches
L
2026-05-19 · Lay/Christensen · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Shawn Lay
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 5-7, 0-1
W
2026-04-28 · Lay/Christensen · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Todd Blackburn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 7-6
W
2026-04-21 · Lay/Christensen · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Craig Christensen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 1-6, 1-0
L
Thomas Good / Matthew Lee
2026-03-21 · TAOU-Lay/Christensen · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Logan Roberts
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-03-14 · TAOU-Lay/Christensen · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Craig Christensen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-03-07 · TAOU-Lay/Christensen · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Joel Littleford
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 2-4, 0-1
W
2026-02-07 · TAOU-Lay/Christensen · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kirk Cerise
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-2
W
2026-01-31 · TAOU-Lay/Christensen · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Joel Littleford
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-0, 1-0
L
2025-07-29 · Cottonwood Club-Littleford/Haan · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Serdar Akkor
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
L
2025-07-22 · Cottonwood Club-Littleford/Haan · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Joel Littleford
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
L
2025-07-15 · Cottonwood Club-Littleford/Haan · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Joel Littleford
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-7
W
2025-07-01 · Cottonwood Club-Littleford/Haan · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jason Morrow
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
Teams24 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
73.7%
14W–5L · 67.6% of games
3.5
40.8%
29W–42L · 46.7% of games
6.5mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
33.3%
2W–4L · 41.2% of games
7.5mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
66.7%
4W–2L · 50% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 40% of the time
#2 Doubles
40%
44 matches
#1 Doubles
30%
33 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
27 matches
#1 Singles
2%
2 matches
#2 Male Doubles
2%
2 matches
#3 Male Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert