← Search

Mark Adams

— year-end
233 matches · 101W–132L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Mark Adams to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history233 matches
W
2026-08-01 · Bolster/Adams · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kenneth Marz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
W
2026-07-16 · Utah/Higgs/55&O/6.0Mwc · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Scott Schaefer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-14 · Bolster/Adams · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Bradley Bolster
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-11 · Utah/Higgs/55&O/6.0Mwc · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Scott Schaefer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-06-30 · Bolster/Adams · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Endhi Visser
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-06-23 · Bolster/Adams · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kenneth Marz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-16 · Bolster/Adams · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Endhi Visser
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-15 · Utah/Higgs/55&O/6.0Mwc · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Scott Schaefer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-06-13 · Utah/Higgs/55&O/6.0Mwc · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Scott Schaefer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
L
2026-05-15 · LP- Double Trouble · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ann Trentman mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-05-12 · Liberty Emus · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-04-21 · Liberty Emus · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Endhi Visser
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
Teams64 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.5
41.8%
51W–71L · 48.5% of games
6.0
85.7%
6W–1L · 65% of games
7.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
70.8%
17W–7L · 56.5% of games
6.5mixed
57.1%
8W–6L · 51.3% of games
7.0mixed
28.6%
10W–25L · 43.2% of games
7.5mixed
25%
4W–12L · 43.7% of games
8.0mixed
50%
4W–4L · 47.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 35% of the time
#2 Doubles
35%
82 matches
#3 Doubles
31%
73 matches
#1 Doubles
27%
63 matches
#1 Singles
3%
6 matches
#2 Singles
2%
5 matches
#1 Male Doubles
1%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams