← Search

Adrienne Lutz

Langhorne, PA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
83 matches · 54W–29L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Adrienne Lutz to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history83 matches
L
2026-08-10 · Smash and Sassy · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Cheryl Kurer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-6
L
2026-08-03 · Smash and Sassy · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Joan Sullivan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-4, 0-1
L
2026-08-02 · Smash and Sassy · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Asha Nambiar
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-25 · Smash and Sassy · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Patricia Menow
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-07-20 · Smash and Sassy · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sanjana Poddar
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-7, 0-1
L
2026-06-24 · Drop Shot Divas · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Alexandra Bowe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-06-20 · Ball Busters · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jessie Shaffer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-06-15 · Drop Shot Divas · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Alexandra Bowe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-06-01 · Drop Shot Divas · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Alexandra Bowe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-16 · Ball Busters · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Faye Wood
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-6
W
2026-05-09 · Ball Busters · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Faye Wood
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-05-04 · Drop Shot Divas · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Alexandra Bowe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams15 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
66.7%
44W–22L · 55.9% of games
3.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
75%
9W–3L · 62.6% of games
7.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 49% of the time
#2 Doubles
49%
41 matches
#1 Doubles
27%
22 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
18 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova