← Search

Rachel Juliana

Plainsboro, NJ
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
228 matches · 108W–120L · seasons 2019–2027

Captains: add Rachel Juliana to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history228 matches
W
2026-08-30 · Smash & Splash · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jigar Shah mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-08-15 · Gino's Gals · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kimberly Park
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
L
2026-08-10 · Simply Smashing · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-4
L
2026-08-05 · High Strung · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Celina Feldstein
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
L
2026-07-22 · High Strung · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tracey Wijesinghe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
L
2026-07-20 · Simply Smashing · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sherry Grumet
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-7
L
2026-07-19 · Smash & Splash · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jigar Shah mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 4-6
L
Christine Zoffinger / Katie Johnson
2026-07-15 · High Strung · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Suparna Kadam
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-29 · Simply Smashing · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Pat Steimle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-4
L
2026-06-24 · High Strung · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Elisa Cohen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
L
2026-06-15 · Simply Smashing · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Melva Adamson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-14 · Gino's Gals · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kimberly Park
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams25 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
61.5%
48W–30L · 56.6% of games
3.5
34.5%
29W–55L · 43.1% of games
4.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
51%
25W–24L · 49.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 33% of the time
#2 Doubles
33%
75 matches
#3 Doubles
31%
71 matches
#1 Doubles
23%
53 matches
#1 Singles
11%
26 matches
#2 Singles
1%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer