← Search

Alycia Parker

Atlanta, GA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
80 matches · 43W–37L · seasons 2021–2027

Captains: add Alycia Parker to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history80 matches
W
2026-07-20 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Gidget Kettle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-5
W
2026-07-12 · Brookwood Manor (Kallie Clack)* · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michelle McIntosh
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-2
W
2026-07-07 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Debbie Granger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 6-1
L
2026-06-23 · Connemara (Mary Edelberg)* · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Diana Lerner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-21 · Brookwood Manor (Kallie Clack)* · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kallie Clack
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
L
2026-06-15 · Brookwood Manor (Kallie Clack)* · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kathleen Geist
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
W
2026-06-15 · Connemara (Mary Edelberg)* · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-06-03 · Brookwood Manor (Kallie Clack)* · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mary Saye
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-01-13 · Connemara (Mary Edelberg)* · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 3-6
W
2026-01-06 · Connemara (Mary Edelberg)* · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
2025-12-06 · Brookwood Manor (Alicia Doyle)* · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
L
2025-11-15 · Brookwood Manor (Alicia Doyle)* · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams14 teams · 2023–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
2.5
75%
3W–1L · 64.6% of games
3.0
83.3%
10W–2L · 60.2% of games
3.5
54.3%
19W–16L · 52.4% of games
4.0
36.4%
8W–14L · 46.6% of games
3.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
25%
1W–3L · 35.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 38% of the time
#1 Doubles
38%
30 matches
#1 Singles
30%
24 matches
#2 Doubles
19%
15 matches
#4 Doubles
8%
6 matches
#3 Doubles
5%
4 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams