← Search

Diana Lerner

Snellville, GA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
102 matches · 62W–40L · seasons 2019–2027

Captains: add Diana Lerner to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history102 matches
W
Ariadne Quinones / Christy Skinner
2026-07-09 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tennille Wilson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
W
2026-06-25 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Margie Hull
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 1-6, 6-1
L
2026-06-23 · Connemara (Mary Edelberg)* · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Alycia Parker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-11 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Julie Kable
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-7, 1-6
L
Sharon Zellerer / Gretchen Murphy
2026-06-07 · #1 Doubles · with Robin Middlebrooks championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 5-7
W
Traci Ludicke / Leigh Montgomery
2026-06-05 · #4 Doubles · with Robin Middlebrooks championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 1-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-04 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Margie Hull
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-05-14 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rhona Albright
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-02-24 · USTA Atlanta/MC Nguyen · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Zane Maraschiello
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-02-10 · USTA Atlanta/MC Nguyen · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lynnessa Snodgrass
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-01-17 · Rhodes Jordan (MC Nguyen)* · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Linde Leggett
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-01-16 · Rhodes Jordan (MC Nguyen)* · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lynnessa Snodgrass
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams14 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.5
56.7%
38W–29L · 53.5% of games
4.0
69.7%
23W–10L · 54.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 32% of the time
#2 Doubles
32%
33 matches
#1 Doubles
28%
28 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
24 matches
#4 Doubles
16%
16 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal