← Search

Staci Steward

Bowie, MD
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
286 matches · 120W–166L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Staci Steward to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history286 matches
W
2026-09-02 · Walker · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kimberly Walker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 2-1
W
2026-08-08 · Net Gains · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Solomon Garedew mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 5-1
W
2026-07-27 · Walker · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kimberly Walker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-0
W
2026-07-26 · Serving You · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Leslie Fields
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-07-26 · Walker · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Obire Owinje
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-07-26 · Net Gains · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Solomon Garedew mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-07-24 · Biggs - Court Side Shenanigans · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Vera Hendon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
L
2026-07-13 · Serving You · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sherri Colston
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 5-7
L
Beth Gregory / Cindy Pohoryles
2026-07-11 · #3 Doubles · with Wanda Fells championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-10 · #3 Doubles · with Wanda Fells championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-07-09 · Serving You · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Joani Clay
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-08 · Walker · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Nikki Rawls
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams61 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
2.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.0
42.3%
90W–123L · 45% of games
3.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
5.5
47.8%
11W–12L · 53.2% of games
6.5
29.4%
5W–12L · 48.1% of games
0.0mixed
0%
0W–4L · 18.6% of games
6.0mixed
81.8%
9W–2L · 60.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 41% of the time
#2 Doubles
41%
116 matches
#3 Doubles
31%
89 matches
#1 Doubles
22%
62 matches
#1 Singles
4%
12 matches
#2 Singles
2%
5 matches
#3 Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams