← Search

Emily Schabacker

Takoma Park, MD
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
332 matches · 158W–174L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Emily Schabacker to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history332 matches
L
2026-09-09 · Tomczak - Ace Queens · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-7
W
2026-08-01 · Racqueteers 3.0 · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 4-5
L
2026-07-28 · Tennis Darlings - Dullabh · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-2
W
2026-07-26 · Racqueteers 3.0 · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-2
L
2026-07-13 · Racqueteers 3.0 · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 0-4
W
Jennifer Alexander
2026-07-12 · Racqueteers 3.0 · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
L
2026-07-10 · #1 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
Cynthia Wofford / Marilyn Moore
2026-07-10 · #3 Doubles · with Kim Cooper championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-09 · Racqueteers 3.0 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Gail Martinez Waters
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-07-05 · Racqueteers 3.0 · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
Kaitlin Bell
2026-06-27 · Racqueteers 3.0 · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 5-2
L
2026-06-19 · Racqueteers 3.0 · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams72 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
0.0
75%
3W–1L · 56.6% of games
2.5
72%
36W–14L · 64.7% of games
3.0
48.7%
94W–99L · 50% of games
3.5
13%
3W–20L · 29.5% of games
5.5
64.3%
9W–5L · 50.8% of games
6.0
50%
2W–2L · 48.8% of games
6.5
15.4%
2W–11L · 36.7% of games
6.0mixed
38.9%
7W–11L · 43% of games
6.5mixed
20%
1W–4L · 43.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 27% of the time
#1 Singles
27%
91 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
71 matches
#1 Doubles
18%
59 matches
#2 Doubles
14%
48 matches
#2 Singles
13%
44 matches
#3 Singles
5%
15 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams