← Search

Steve Boos

— year-end
53 matches · 16W–37L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Steve Boos to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history53 matches
L
Chris Cox / David May
2026-06-20 · Smith, John · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jeff Thimgan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-16 · Reboulet, Addisen · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Paul Henry
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
L
2026-06-02 · Reboulet, Addisen · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-05-19 · Reboulet, Addisen · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with David Coleman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
Norman Friedman / Emmett Logan
2026-05-16 · Smith, John · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jeff Thimgan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-04-28 · Reboulet, Addisen · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-1, 0-1
L
2026-04-11 · Smith, John · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jeff Thimgan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-04-04 · Smith, John · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jeff Thimgan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
L
2026-03-14 · Granger, Nathan · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-03-07 · Smith, John · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with John Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-03-01 · Granger, Nathan · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-02-21 · Smith, John · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with John Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
Teams26 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
34.5%
10W–19L · 47.4% of games
4.0
0%
0W–9L · 28.2% of games
7.0
100%
4W–0L · 57% of games
8.0
12.5%
1W–7L · 38.9% of games
7.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 34% of the time
#3 Doubles
34%
18 matches
#1 Doubles
25%
13 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
12 matches
#1 Singles
11%
6 matches
#2 Singles
8%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer