← Search

David Coleman

Leawood, KS
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
128 matches · 62W–66L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add David Coleman to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history128 matches
W
2026-07-31 · Jacelone, Marcia · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lisa Thompson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-0
W
2026-07-17 · Jacelone, Marcia · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Niorn Nicholas mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-07-10 · Jacelone, Marcia · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lisa Thompson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-06-19 · Jacelone, Marcia · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Karen Rogers mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-06-13 · Granger, Nathan · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Randal Nadolny
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 0-6
L
2026-06-12 · Jacelone, Marcia · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lisa Thompson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 0-6
W
2026-06-09 · Reboulet, Addisen · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nicholas Murphy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-4
L
2026-05-19 · Reboulet, Addisen · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Steve Boos
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-15 · Jacelone, Marcia · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Niorn Nicholas mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-05-12 · Reboulet, Addisen · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
L
2026-05-02 · Granger, Nathan · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Troy Thomasson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-7
W
2026-04-04 · Granger, Nathan · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Randal Nadolny
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams42 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
2.5
0%
0W–6L · 35.5% of games
3.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5
62%
31W–19L · 56.1% of games
4.0
29.2%
7W–17L · 42% of games
7.0
56.2%
9W–7L · 51.8% of games
7.0mixed
48.4%
15W–16L · 51.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 37% of the time
#1 Doubles
37%
47 matches
#3 Doubles
32%
41 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
31 matches
#2 Singles
4%
5 matches
#1 Singles
3%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer