← Search

Ben Freiburger

Lexington, SC
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
45 matches · 37W–8L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Ben Freiburger to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history45 matches
W
2026-07-13 · LATA 4.0M 18 & Over (Hamrick) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Megan Freiburger mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-07-10 · LATA 4.0M 18 & Over (Hamrick) · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lisa Hamrick mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-3
W
Michael Barker / Carey Wood
2026-06-22 · CTL (A) 4.0M 18 & Over (Hamrick) · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Erica Didonato mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-06-01 · CTL (A) 4.0M 18 & Over (Hamrick) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amy Redfield mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-1
W
2025-08-19 · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Kyle Edwards
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-4, 1-0
L
2025-08-07 · LATA18/Small/LCC · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Garrett Prochaska
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2025-07-19 · LATA18/Boland/CAMP · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jim Wescott
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
2025-06-20 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sally Nguyen mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-2
W
2025-06-11 · LATA18/Freiburger/LCTC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sally Nguyen mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-3
W
Michael Barker / Hannah Davis
2025-06-02 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jessica Hallman mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-3, 1-0
W
2025-05-24 · LATA18/Boland/CAMP · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Joshua Estes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-5
W
2025-04-02 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kevin Felkel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams37 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
88.9%
8W–1L · 61.5% of games
4.0
75%
12W–4L · 57.9% of games
6.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.5
85.7%
6W–1L · 57.9% of games
8.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.0mixed
88.9%
8W–1L · 63.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 62% of the time
#1 Doubles
62%
28 matches
#2 Doubles
20%
9 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
7 matches
#2 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You can get through anything if you keep going one point at a time.
Arthur Ashe