← Search

Laurie Lahnert

— year-end
177 matches · 98W–79L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Laurie Lahnert to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history177 matches
L
2026-08-31 · LTC-M RED · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Roxi Brown Granger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-7, 0-1
W
2026-08-31 · LTC-M RED · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Christina Santino
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-08-17 · LTC-M RED · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Roxi Brown Granger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-10 · LTC-M RED · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Meegan Miloud
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
W
2026-08-05 · LTC-M YELLOW · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Christina Santino
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
L
Beth Godzich / Jennifer Fitzgerald
2026-08-01 · #2 Doubles · with Rebecca BaanHofman championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
W
2026-07-29 · LTC-M YELLOW · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jennifer Withington
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-07-26 · LTC-M BLUE · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Philip Lahnert mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-07-22 · LTC-M YELLOW · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jennifer Withington
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-12 · LTC-M BLUE · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Zachary Knaus mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-07-06 · LTC-M PURPLE · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with JANE PARIS
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-07-05 · LTC-M GREEN · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Zachary Knaus mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 6-1, 0-1
Teams46 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
2.5
76%
19W–6L · 62.5% of games
3.0
53.5%
46W–40L · 51.1% of games
6.0
66.7%
12W–6L · 58.2% of games
5.5mixed
50%
4W–4L · 53.1% of games
6.0mixed
50%
10W–10L · 51.2% of games
6.5mixed
44.4%
4W–5L · 45.6% of games
7.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 37% of the time
#1 Doubles
37%
65 matches
#2 Doubles
35%
62 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
42 matches
#1 Singles
5%
8 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer