← Search

Jody Alderman

Boulder, CO
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
93 matches · 61W–32L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Jody Alderman to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history93 matches
L
2026-08-17 · RHCC BLUE · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jennifer Curtis-Jones
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-20 · RHCC BLUE · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Alecia Drake
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-6
W
2026-07-06 · RHCC BLUE · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jue Abrahamson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-06-22 · RHCC BLUE · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Alecia Drake
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-01 · RHCC BLUE · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Alecia Drake
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
W
2026-05-18 · RHCC RED · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jue Abrahamson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
L
2026-05-13 · RHCC RED · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Brenda Christy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-05-11 · RHCC RED · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Alecia Drake
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-02 · RHCC RED · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jue Abrahamson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-04-20 · RHCC RED · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Melissa Bauknight
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-04-13 · RHCC RED · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Alecia Drake
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-04-04 · RHCC RED · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lana Mendonca
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams28 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
0.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0
67.4%
60W–29L · 54.7% of games
7.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 45% of the time
#2 Doubles
45%
42 matches
#1 Doubles
32%
30 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
20 matches
#1 Female Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer