MARY HOLTZ
112 matches · 60W–52L · seasons 2022–2026
Captains: add MARY HOLTZ to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.
Match history112 matches
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-7, 0-1
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-5
Teams32 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
47.2%
42W–47L · 49.9% of games
4.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.5
82.4%
14W–3L · 57.3% of games
7.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.
By lineusually #1 Doubles, 46% of the time
#1 Doubles
46%
52 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
36 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
21 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
3 matches
How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.
It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.