← Search

Amy Jarck

Mount Pleasant, SC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
122 matches · 64W–58L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Amy Jarck to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history122 matches
W
2026-09-06 · LCTA55/Wiggins/MPR · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kari Roever
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-09-05 · LCTA55/Wiggins/MPR · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Susy Teale
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-0
W
2026-08-25 · LCTA18/White/MPR · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Silvia Carrara
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
Rebecca Williams / Diana Shirley
2026-08-22 · LCTA55/Wiggins/MPR · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Olga Haefele
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-18 · LCTA18/White/MPR · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Laura Prince
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
L
2026-07-11 · LCTA55/Wiggins/MPR · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Susy Teale
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
L
2026-06-12 · LCTA40/Sutherland/Hamlin · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Greg Sokoloski mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 3-6
L
Stephanie Davis / Bill Park
2026-05-20 · LCTA40/Sutherland/Hamlin · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Greg Sokoloski mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-05-14 · LCTA40/Sutherland/Hamlin · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Douglas Smith mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 7-6
W
2026-03-27 · LCTA55/Felix/I’OnClub · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with MARY HOLTZ
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-03-25 · LCTA40/WIGGINS/HAMLIN · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kristin Steele
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-03-18 · LCTA40/WIGGINS/HAMLIN · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kristin Steele
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-7, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams23 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
100%
6W–0L · 70.6% of games
3.5
46.5%
40W–46L · 49.7% of games
6.5
65.2%
15W–8L · 55.9% of games
7.5
50%
2W–2L · 41.5% of games
3.5mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 48% of the time
#1 Doubles
48%
58 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
39 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
21 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
3 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer