← Search

Elizabeth Keith

Richmond, VA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
25 matches · 11W–14L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Elizabeth Keith to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history25 matches
L
2026-07-20 · Westwood - Payne/West · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Heather Harker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-7, 0-1
L
2026-07-13 · Westwood - Payne/West · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Heather Harker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-24 · 10 Mid-Court Crisis - Combs-Pokrywka · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Carin Krawitz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-06-15 · Westwood - Payne/West · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Heather Harker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
L
2026-06-10 · 10 Mid-Court Crisis - Combs-Pokrywka · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Colleen Quinn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-06 · WW Simply Smashing - Racelis · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Erica Kaplan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-04-26 · WW Simply Smashing - Racelis · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-04-25 · WW Simply Smashing - Racelis · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
W
2025-04-19 · Simply Smashing - WW Racelis · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
L
2025-01-12 · 22 Westwood Warfield 7.0 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Harry Turton mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 1-6
L
2024-06-02 · Belmont Bradts · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2024-05-20 · Belmont Bradts · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams28 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.0
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5
50%
5W–5L · 53.4% of games
4.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
25%
1W–3L · 38.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 32% of the time
#1 Singles
32%
8 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
6 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
5 matches
#1 Doubles
12%
3 matches
#2 Singles
8%
2 matches
#2 Female Doubles
4%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Tennis is mostly mental. You win or lose the match before you even go out there.
Venus Williams