← Search

Laura West Hatcher

— year-end
62 matches · 26W–36L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Laura West Hatcher to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history62 matches
W
2026-06-26 · Avalon Calhoun · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Gregory Blouch mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 7-5
L
2026-06-14 · TDC Summer WeekEND - Lobred · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Johanna Farrell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
2026-06-12 · 5 CCV Norfleet · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jenny Norfleet
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-06-10 · 5 CCV Norfleet · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Melissa Mauck
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2025-11-08 · 6 CCV DeLacey · #3 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2025-08-12 · CCV Bartzen · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Mary Bartzen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2024-08-21 · F5 CCV Bartzen · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Melissa Mauck
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-6
W
2024-08-01 · F5 CCV Bartzen · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Teresa Whitworth
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W
Maureen McGrath / Cindy Eramian
2024-07-25 · F5 CCV Bartzen · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Teresa Whitworth
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
L
2024-07-16 · G CCV DeLacey · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amanda Galanti
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
Jane Kauder / Michele Smith
2024-07-11 · F5 CCV Bartzen · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Nancy Young
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 1-6, 1-0
L
2024-06-27 · G CCV DeLacey · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kim Cressy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
Teams46 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
3.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
4.0
40%
8W–12L · 45.8% of games
7.5
33.3%
3W–6L · 48.1% of games
8.0
60%
3W–2L · 52.6% of games
8.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.0mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.5mixed
60%
3W–2L · 52.2% of games
8.0mixed
28.6%
4W–10L · 41.4% of games
8.5mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 45% of the time
#2 Doubles
45%
28 matches
#3 Doubles
27%
17 matches
#1 Doubles
23%
14 matches
#1 Singles
2%
1 match
#3 Singles
2%
1 match
#4 Doubles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer