← Search

Dena Porter

Sandy, UT
3.5C year-end 2023
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
114 matches · 51W–63L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Dena Porter to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history114 matches
W
2026-04-30 · Lombardi · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Rich Gurr mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-4
L
Matthew Lee / Kate Stalsberg
2026-04-17 · #1 Doubles · with Rich Gurr championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-04-03 · Lombardi · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Rich Gurr mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-03-21 · Lombardi · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Clay Snaza mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-03-20 · Lombardi · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Rich Gurr mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 7-6
W
2026-03-13 · Lombardi · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Rich Gurr mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-03-06 · Lombardi · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Rich Gurr mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-02-20 · Lombardi · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Rich Gurr mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
N/A
2026-02-06 · Lombardi · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Rich Gurr mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2025-03-14 · Liberty Park-Lombardi · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Rich Gurr mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 4-6
W
2025-03-01 · Liberty Park-Lombardi · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Rich Gurr mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-4
L
David Klein / Christine Littleford
2025-02-28 · Liberty Park-Lombardi · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Rich Gurr mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams31 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
0.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0
38.1%
8W–13L · 44.7% of games
3.5
52.2%
12W–11L · 51.4% of games
4.0
40%
2W–3L · 46.7% of games
6.0
50%
2W–2L · 45.1% of games
7.0
50%
2W–2L · 58% of games
7.0mixed
48.5%
16W–17L · 49.5% of games
7.5mixed
42.9%
6W–8L · 46% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 29% of the time
#1 Doubles
29%
33 matches
#1 Singles
19%
22 matches
#2 Doubles
17%
19 matches
#3 Doubles
13%
15 matches
#2 Singles
6%
7 matches
#1 Female Doubles
5%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova