← Search

Christina Prock

Virginia Beach, VA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
92 matches · 62W–30L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Christina Prock to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history92 matches
W
2026-09-11 · Caskill - Tri Me · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ashley Jessee
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
W
2026-09-09 · Caskill - Tri Me · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ashley Jessee
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-4
W
2026-09-02 · Caskill - Tri Me · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Liz Martin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-08-26 · Caskill - Tri Me · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Gail Moyer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-08-21 · Caskill - Tri Me · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jenna Barnes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 2-6, 1-0
L
Maureen Fox / Kim Miller
2026-08-07 · #2 Doubles · with Yuli Reams championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-05 · Caskill - Tri Me · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jenna Barnes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-17 · #1 Doubles · with Cindy Aston championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-07-15 · Domanski · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Laura McMahon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
L
2026-06-29 · Domanski · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stephanie Granger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-05-20 · Domanski · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Estela Reid
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-04-22 · Domanski · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christina Bartholomew
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-1, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams17 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
77.8%
35W–10L · 60% of games
4.0
51.7%
15W–14L · 49.1% of games
6.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.5
50%
2W–2L · 48.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 32% of the time
#1 Doubles
32%
29 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
20 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
19 matches
#2 Singles
14%
13 matches
#1 Singles
12%
11 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert