← Search

Naomi Stroud-Peterson

Sandy, UT
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
296 matches · 139W–157L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Naomi Stroud-Peterson to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history296 matches
L
2026-08-10 · SM-Stroud Peterson/Wood · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jamie Harris
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 0-6
W
2026-08-10 · #3 Doubles · with Britta Davis championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-07-29 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jamie Harris
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-07-28 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Evans
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-07-22 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Britta Davis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-07-21 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Evans
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
Julianne Thibodeaux / Lyndsey Packham
2026-07-20 · SM-Stroud Peterson/Wood · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rebecca Rynders
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-6
W
2026-07-15 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jamie Harris
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-07-06 · SM-Stroud Peterson/Wood · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Chelsea Wood
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
W
2026-07-01 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Courtney Archibald
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-20 · #1 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
L
2026-06-20 · #2 Doubles · with Jamie Harris championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams81 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
0.0
40%
2W–3L · 52.1% of games
2.5
52.5%
21W–19L · 53.3% of games
3.0
53.2%
84W–74L · 48.9% of games
3.5
31.3%
21W–46L · 43.9% of games
4.0
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
5.5mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
33.3%
3W–6L · 40.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 31% of the time
#2 Doubles
31%
91 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
78 matches
#1 Doubles
24%
70 matches
#1 Singles
8%
24 matches
#4 Doubles
4%
11 matches
#2 Singles
3%
9 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Pressure is a privilege.
Billie Jean King