← Search

Chelsea Wood

Salt Lake City, UT
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
176 matches · 63W–113L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Chelsea Wood to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history176 matches
L
2026-09-01 · Sports Mall-Wood · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Miche Ferrin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-08-07 · SM- I'd Hit That · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Rob Wood mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-08-04 · Sports Mall-Wood · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Miche Ferrin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
L
2026-07-28 · Sports Mall-Wood · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Miche Ferrin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
L
2026-07-14 · Sports Mall-Wood · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
W
2026-07-13 · SM-Stroud Peterson/Wood · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lindsey Pizza
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-07-07 · Sports Mall-Wood · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
W
2026-07-06 · SM-Stroud Peterson/Wood · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Naomi Stroud-Peterson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
L
2026-06-23 · Sports Mall-Wood · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
W
2026-05-27 · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-05-26 · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-20 · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams59 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
2.5
64.9%
24W–13L · 53.3% of games
3.0
51%
26W–25L · 51.6% of games
3.5
14%
12W–74L · 34.9% of games
6.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.5mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 36% of the time
#1 Singles
36%
63 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
40 matches
#1 Doubles
20%
35 matches
#3 Doubles
11%
20 matches
#2 Singles
6%
10 matches
#4 Doubles
5%
8 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer