← Search

Jaclyn Carney

Nashville, TN
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
35 matches · 24W–11L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Jaclyn Carney to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history35 matches
W
2026-08-18 · Tharp/Bateman/Nashville · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Stephanie Knight
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-09 · Knight/Bateman/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kate Tharp
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-11 · Knight/Bateman/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Catherine Felton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-1, 0-1
W
2026-04-07 · Babu/Nashville · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-03-31 · Ouellette/Nashville · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2025-10-31 · Babu/Hambridge/Nashville · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 1-6
W
Renee Stewart / Emily Johnson
2025-10-21 · Babu/Hambridge/Nashville · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kate Tharp
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
W
2025-04-25 · Hambidge/Nashville · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kristin Barlowe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-0
W
2025-04-11 · Hambidge/Nashville · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W
2025-04-08 · Babu/Nashville · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Laura Corder
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
L
2025-03-21 · Hambidge/Nashville · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kate Tharp
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2025-03-18 · Babu/Nashville · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams21 teams · 2023–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
92.3%
12W–1L · 70.8% of games
3.5
50%
10W–10L · 52.8% of games
6.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 37% of the time
#1 Singles
37%
13 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
9 matches
#1 Doubles
17%
6 matches
#2 Doubles
17%
6 matches
#2 Singles
3%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert