← Search

Kate Tharp

— year-end
75 matches · 41W–34L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Kate Tharp to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history75 matches
W
2026-09-02 · Randolph/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Laura Wilson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-26 · Randolph/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Katherine Goodson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 7-6, 0-1
W
Brooke Vane / Emily Walker
2026-08-25 · Tharp/Bateman/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Ally Bateman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-08-14 · Hermann/Nashville · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Lisa Yawn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-09 · Babu/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jaclyn Carney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-06 · Babu/Nashville · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lissa Jarnigan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
W
2026-06-18 · Babu/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Grace Hogue
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-1
L
2026-06-16 · Babu/Nashville · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lissa Jarnigan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-7, 0-1
L
2026-06-03 · Babu/Nashville · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lissa Jarnigan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-04-27 · Hambidge/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lissa Jarnigan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-04-21 · Babu/Nashville · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nicole Babu
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-1, 0-1
L
2026-04-13 · Hambidge/Nashville · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Katherine Church
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
Teams36 teams · 2022–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
75%
15W–5L · 59.5% of games
3.5
38.7%
12W–19L · 48.8% of games
4.0
42.9%
3W–4L · 43.9% of games
6.5
71.4%
10W–4L · 58.3% of games
7.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 31% of the time
#1 Doubles
31%
23 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
23 matches
#3 Doubles
31%
23 matches
#1 Singles
3%
2 matches
#2 Singles
3%
2 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams