← Search

Jason Sperry

Lancaster, PA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
41 matches · 31W–10L · seasons 2021–2025

Captains: add Jason Sperry to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history41 matches
W
2025-08-17 · #2 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2025-06-04 · Hempfield - Roeder Davis · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2025-05-17 · Hempfield - Roeder Davis · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-7, 0-1
W
2024-07-20 · Hempfield - Hutton-3.5 · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
W
2024-07-13 · Hempfield - Hutton-3.5 · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2024-06-09 · Hempfield - Hutton-3.5 · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
L
2024-02-09 · Hempfield - Lo Tienes (Lingenfelter) · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Bonnie Nolt mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 4-6
L
2024-01-28 · Hempfield - Lo Tienes (Lingenfelter) · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Bonnie Nolt mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 0-6
L
2023-11-03 · Hempfield - Hutton Bows · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with John Roeder
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2023-10-27 · Hempfield - Hutton Bows · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Chris Pierce
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 2-6, 0-1
W
2023-09-23 · Hempfield - Hutton Bows · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Chris Pierce
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 3-6, 1-0
L
2023-09-10 · Hempfield - Hutton Bows · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with John Roeder
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams10 teams · 2021–2025
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
78.3%
18W–5L · 66.5% of games
3.5
85.7%
6W–1L · 64.2% of games
7.0
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
50%
2W–2L · 43% of games
7.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 39% of the time
#1 Singles
39%
16 matches
#2 Singles
27%
11 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
9 matches
#2 Doubles
7%
3 matches
#1 Doubles
5%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal