← Search

Matt Campbell

— year-end
115 matches · 77W–38L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Matt Campbell to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history115 matches
W
2026-08-26 · FLYHS JONES · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
W
2026-08-19 · FLYHS JONES · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mike Hjelkrem
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
Kevin Ray / Josh Lozow
2026-08-15 · #2 Doubles · with Chase Campbell championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-08-14 · #3 Doubles · with Steve Jones championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-08-05 · FLYHS JONES · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Diogo Carvalho
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
W
2026-07-25 · #3 Doubles · with Tisha Hickerson championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-07-24 · #3 Doubles · with Esperanza Campbell championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-24 · #3 Doubles · with Esperanza Campbell championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 1-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-22 · FLYHS JONES · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Chase Campbell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-07-15 · FLYHS JONES · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Steve Jones
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 0-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-08 · FLYHS JONES · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Diogo Carvalho
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-1
L
2026-06-24 · FLYHS JONES · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Aaron Pring
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
Teams25 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
81.8%
9W–2L · 58.2% of games
3.5
68.3%
28W–13L · 55.3% of games
4.0
63.2%
12W–7L · 54.1% of games
6.0mixed
75%
3W–1L · 68.2% of games
6.5mixed
60%
3W–2L · 54.4% of games
7.0mixed
57.7%
15W–11L · 52.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 35% of the time
#2 Doubles
35%
40 matches
#1 Doubles
28%
32 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
21 matches
#1 Singles
14%
16 matches
#2 Singles
5%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal