← Search

Dana Sandberg

Centennial, CO
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
126 matches · 75W–51L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Dana Sandberg to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history126 matches
L
2026-08-25 · WC BLUE · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stephanie Burt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 0-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-23 · CPV RED · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Bryan Kortum mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-08-20 · WC BLUE · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jessica Seidlitz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
Michelle Millet / Daniel Ernst
2026-08-16 · CPV RED · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with John Cranston mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-31 · CPV RED · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Robert Hall mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 2-6
W
2026-07-31 · WC BLUE · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stacy Masur
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-07-25 · #3 Doubles · with Robert Hall championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-16 · WC RED · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Juli Simmermon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
L
2026-07-09 · WC RED · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with CC Dick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2026-07-02 · WC RED · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stephanie Burt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-7, 0-1
W
2026-06-28 · CPV GREEN · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Robert Hall mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-25 · WC RED · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jamie Gagne
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams27 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
2.5
100%
18W–0L · 81.3% of games
3.0
73.3%
33W–12L · 59.1% of games
3.5
33.3%
15W–30L · 43.7% of games
6.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
75%
3W–1L · 49.3% of games
7.5mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 35% of the time
#1 Doubles
35%
44 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
35 matches
#1 Singles
21%
26 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
17 matches
#2 Singles
3%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer