← Search

MacY Mathew

— year-end
98 matches · 34W–64L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add MacY Mathew to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history98 matches
L
2026-07-19 · Eccles · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Mark Reedy mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 4-6
W
2026-04-03 · Seitz/Wolf-Crestview · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amy Mathew
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-03-07 · Seitz/Wolf-Crestview · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rachel McMahon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-5
W
2025-12-21 · Neidert, Pamela · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sarah Craig
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
W
2025-12-07 · Neidert, Pamela · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rachel Seitz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-4, 1-0
W
2025-11-16 · Neidert, Pamela · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Meara Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2025-11-02 · Prasad, Pritha · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Amy Mathew
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2025-10-12 · Prasad, Pritha · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Amy Mathew
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
W
2025-10-07 · Leslie Echols · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Melissa Goodman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 0-6, 1-0
L
2025-10-07 · Leslie Echols · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Melissa Goodman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-0, 0-1
L
2025-10-07 · Leslie Echols · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Melissa Goodman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 7-6, 0-1
L
2025-09-28 · Neidert, Pamela · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rachel Seitz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-7, 0-1
Teams34 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
4.0
42.6%
23W–31L · 47.8% of games
4.5
5.3%
1W–18L · 29.2% of games
7.0mixed
50%
3W–3L · 55.9% of games
8.0mixed
37.5%
6W–10L · 44.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 34% of the time
#1 Doubles
34%
33 matches
#1 Singles
21%
21 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
20 matches
#2 Doubles
19%
19 matches
#2 Singles
5%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer