← Search

Emily Skrobacz

Topeka, KS
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
54 matches · 36W–18L · seasons 2022–2027

Captains: add Emily Skrobacz to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history54 matches
W
2026-09-13 · Geick, Susan · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Veronika Hayslett
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-6
L
2026-08-19 · Edwards, Alice · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Susan Bernstein
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-12 · Edwards, Alice · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Laura Dicus
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
L
2026-05-11 · Geick, Susan · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sarah Page
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-04-27 · Geick, Susan · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-04-20 · Geick, Susan · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Laura Dicus
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2025-12-14 · Geick, Susan · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sarah Page
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-7
W
2025-11-16 · Geick, Susan · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sarah Page
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-5
W
2025-11-09 · Geick, Susan · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Laura Dicus
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
L
2025-10-26 · Geick, Susan · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brenna Gray
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 4-6
W
2025-10-19 · Geick, Susan · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sarah Page
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-4
W
2025-10-12 · Geick, Susan · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Robin Yaple
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams16 teams · 2022–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
33.3%
2W–4L · 38.8% of games
3.5
76.9%
20W–6L · 63.7% of games
4.0
63.6%
14W–8L · 51.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 32% of the time
#1 Singles
32%
17 matches
#1 Doubles
22%
12 matches
#2 Doubles
20%
11 matches
#2 Singles
17%
9 matches
#3 Doubles
9%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe