← Search

David Alfonso

NEW YORK, NY
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
131 matches · 95W–36L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add David Alfonso to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history131 matches
W
N/A
2026-06-29 · Rader/Bhagwagar · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tony Ngo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-06-27 · #1 Doubles · with Tony Ngo championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-27 · #1 Doubles · with Adam Katz championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 1-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-26 · #1 Doubles · with Adam Katz championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-06-02 · Rader/Bhagwagar · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Bradley Faskowitz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 5-5
L
2026-05-28 · Rader/Bhagwagar · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
W
2026-05-21 · Bhagwagar · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stephan Mignot
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-6
L
2026-05-01 · Bhagwagar · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Damian Zunino
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
W
2026-04-23 · #3 Doubles · with Tamara Casteels championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-04-10 · Lopez/Damarasingu · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Willow Liu mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-04-01 · Eastern/Perez/4.0Tri-level Men · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Noriyuki Kawai
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-03-09 · Queens: Huang · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Lulu Huang mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams31 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
0.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.5
76.5%
26W–8L · 60% of games
4.0
55.6%
10W–8L · 51.7% of games
7.0mixed
73.1%
19W–7L · 57.9% of games
8.0mixed
85.7%
6W–1L · 64.1% of games
9.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 34% of the time
#3 Doubles
34%
44 matches
#1 Doubles
30%
39 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
32 matches
#2 Singles
7%
9 matches
#1 Singles
5%
7 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe