← Search

Jocelyn Bennion

Heber City, UT
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
209 matches · 119W–90L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Jocelyn Bennion to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history209 matches
W
2026-08-04 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Davies
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-07-29 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Davies
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-28 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Davies
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-16 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Davies
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-14 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Davies
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-07-11 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Davies
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-10 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Davies
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-07 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jessica Studdert
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-07-07 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jessica Studdert
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-06-25 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Davies
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
Chieko Perry / Kristin Baker
2026-06-23 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rina Benson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-4
W
2026-06-23 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stephanie Benton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams39 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
2.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0
52.9%
37W–33L · 50.7% of games
3.5
58.1%
61W–44L · 55.2% of games
4.0
63.6%
14W–8L · 55.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 52% of the time
#1 Doubles
52%
108 matches
#2 Doubles
17%
36 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
34 matches
#4 Doubles
7%
15 matches
#2 Singles
2%
5 matches
#1 Singles
1%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova