← Search

Erin Bradley

Draper, UT
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
242 matches · 145W–97L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Erin Bradley to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history242 matches
W
2026-08-27 · Sports Mall-No Love Lost · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Martha Brown
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-08-04 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tiffany Zarbock
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-30 · SM-Stroud Peterson/Wood · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Breanne Taylor
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-7
W
2026-07-29 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Breanne Taylor
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-07-28 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tiffany Zarbock
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-07-20 · SM-Stroud Peterson/Wood · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sonja Blackham
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-0
L
2026-07-17 · SM- I'd Hit That · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jeremiah Bradley mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-15 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Martha Brown
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-07-13 · SM-Stroud Peterson/Wood · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Emily Waltman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 5-7, 0-1
W
2026-07-10 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Martha Brown
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
L
2026-07-10 · SM- I'd Hit That · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Luke Bradley mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 1-6
W
2026-07-09 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Breanne Taylor
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams79 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
2.5
54.5%
12W–10L · 45.7% of games
3.0
55.8%
29W–23L · 54.6% of games
3.5
88.9%
32W–4L · 62.9% of games
4.0
59.2%
61W–42L · 54.7% of games
6.0mixed
62.5%
5W–3L · 60.3% of games
6.5mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
27.3%
3W–8L · 45.3% of games
7.5mixed
25%
1W–3L · 41.9% of games
8.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 35% of the time
#1 Doubles
35%
85 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
70 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
43 matches
#1 Singles
11%
26 matches
#4 Doubles
6%
14 matches
#2 Singles
2%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe