← Search

Sally Licandro

Charlotte, NC
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
107 matches · 50W–57L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Sally Licandro to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history107 matches
L
2026-09-09 · BBaker (Queens) · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Danielle Gier
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-15 · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2026-06-24 · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-10 · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-04-29 · BBaker (Park Road) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Danielle Gier
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-04-15 · BBaker (Park Road) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Danielle Gier
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-04-01 · BBaker (Park Road) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Danielle Gier
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
L
2026-03-25 · BBaker (Park Road) · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
Rachel Miller / Madelynn Bates
2026-03-04 · BBaker (Park Road) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Brittany Baker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-02-11 · APurmort (Queens) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Danielle Gier
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
Laura Case / Julie Moore
2026-01-20 · APurmort (Queens) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kara Tringali
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2025-12-11 · APurmort (Queens) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Allison Purmort
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams28 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
55%
22W–18L · 50.2% of games
3.5
39.4%
13W–20L · 44.4% of games
5.5
66.7%
4W–2L · 54.5% of games
6.5
36.8%
7W–12L · 46.4% of games
6.0mixed
60%
3W–2L · 45.2% of games
7.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 32% of the time
#1 Doubles
32%
34 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
33 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
15 matches
#3 Singles
11%
12 matches
#2 Singles
8%
9 matches
#1 Singles
4%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The moment of victory is much too short to live for that and nothing else.
Martina Navratilova