← Search

Annie Hart

ROCK HILL, SC
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
44 matches · 22W–22L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Annie Hart to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history44 matches
W
2026-09-09 · ABroemel (Queens) · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Stacy Melton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-09-02 · ABroemel (Queens) · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Marietta Wickham
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-08-19 · ABroemel (Queens) · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Marietta Wickham
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-0, 0-1
W
2026-08-12 · ABroemel (Queens) · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Tiffany Schenberger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-07-29 · ABroemel (Queens) · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Marietta Wickham
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-07-15 · ABroemel (Queens) · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Hailey Foreman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-01 · #3 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-06-17 · ABroemel (Queens) · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kathryn Pride
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-04-29 · ABroemel (Jeff Adams) · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
Emma SEGAL / Katie White
2026-04-08 · ABroemel (Jeff Adams) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tiffany Schenberger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-03-18 · ABroemel (Jeff Adams) · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
W
2026-03-11 · ABroemel (Jeff Adams) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tiffany Schenberger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams20 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
2.5
100%
4W–0L · 72.1% of games
3.0
12.5%
1W–7L · 34.4% of games
3.5
44.4%
8W–10L · 45.4% of games
5.5
50%
2W–2L · 61.5% of games
6.5
77.8%
7W–2L · 63.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 30% of the time
#1 Doubles
30%
13 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
13 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
10 matches
#1 Singles
11%
5 matches
#2 Singles
5%
2 matches
#3 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams