← Search

Christi-Ann Wiltberger

Cary, NC
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
128 matches · 61W–67L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Christi-Ann Wiltberger to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history128 matches
L
2026-09-09 · Ch.Wiltberger40C · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Michelle Spangenberg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-08-30 · MD.Guccia · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Angie Bostrom
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 5-7
L
2026-08-19 · Ch.Wiltberger40C · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Lindsey Guccia
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 0-6
W
2026-08-12 · Ch.Wiltberger40C · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Susan Newton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-08-05 · MD.Park · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Erin Riddick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-16 · MD.Park · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Karen Merchant
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-06-30 · MD.Riddick · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Becky King
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
N/A
2026-06-30 · RBonello-DUR · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Malinda Hain
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-06-09 · MD.Riddick · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Drew Long
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-09 · RBonello-DUR · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Meredith Heath
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-06-04 · MD.Park · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Meredith Heath
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-06-02 · RBonello-DUR · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Becky King
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams46 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
0.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
2.5
44.4%
4W–5L · 48.5% of games
3.0
63.3%
31W–18L · 53.7% of games
3.5
28.1%
9W–23L · 40.8% of games
5.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
5.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.5
45%
9W–11L · 48.9% of games
6.0mixed
40%
2W–3L · 42.9% of games
7.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 41% of the time
#3 Doubles
41%
53 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
36 matches
#1 Doubles
17%
22 matches
#2 Singles
4%
5 matches
#3 Singles
4%
5 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe