← Search

Mary Zimardo

Raleigh, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
157 matches · 118W–39L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Mary Zimardo to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history157 matches
W
2026-09-09 · Ma.Zimardo40C · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Debra Neville
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-09-04 · De.Turner40C · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Mollie Hodl
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 5-2
W
2026-09-02 · Ma.Zimardo40C · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Kelly Day
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-08-27 · De.Turner40C · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Julie Tuttle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
W
2026-08-26 · Ma.Zimardo40C · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Kelly Day
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-08-25 · Ma.Gonella18C · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Margaret Ann Gonella
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-08-12 · Ma.Zimardo40C · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Kristin Esham
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-07-31 · Me.Delorme18T · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stephanie Tracey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-07-24 · Me.Delorme18T · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stephanie Tracey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-07-21 · Me.Delorme18T · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kimberly Monsees
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
N/A
2026-06-30 · Me.Delorme18T · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Elisabeth Van Order
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-06-26 · Me.Delorme18T · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stephanie Tracey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 1-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams36 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
2.5
80%
8W–2L · 65.1% of games
3.0
71.9%
41W–16L · 64.9% of games
3.5
76.9%
30W–9L · 59.2% of games
5.5
90.9%
10W–1L · 69.9% of games
6.5
82.4%
14W–3L · 62.7% of games
7.5
100%
6W–0L · 72.4% of games
6.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 38% of the time
#1 Doubles
38%
60 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
40 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
36 matches
#2 Singles
6%
10 matches
#1 Singles
4%
6 matches
#3 Singles
3%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal