← Search

Ruthann Ross

— year-end
11 matches · 4W–7L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add Ruthann Ross to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history11 matches
L
2026-09-11 · Anderson/Schmid/Nashville · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Catherine Devane
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-09-04 · Anderson/Schmid/Nashville · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Elizabeth Drew
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
L
2026-08-26 · Hitmakers 3.5 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Becky Morgan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-08-14 · Anderson/Schmid/Nashville · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Patricia Villalta
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
Sarah Wilson / Jaclyn Smith
2026-08-06 · Hitmakers 3.5 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tanya Petrucha
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
L
2026-07-31 · Anderson/Schmid/Nashville · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Casey Dyer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
W
2026-07-23 · Hitmakers 3.5 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tanya Petrucha
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-07-09 · Hitmakers 3.5 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tanya Petrucha
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-06-25 · Hitmakers 3.5 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tanya Petrucha
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2025-04-18 · Hocker/Lawing/Nashville · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Christy Sykes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2025-03-28 · Hocker/Lawing/Nashville · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cindy Denson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
Teams7 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.5
57.1%
4W–3L · 56.6% of games
7.5
0%
0W–4L · 26.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 55% of the time
#2 Doubles
55%
6 matches
#3 Doubles
27%
3 matches
#1 Doubles
18%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams