← Search

Lane Purvis

— year-end
95 matches · 74W–21L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Lane Purvis to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history95 matches
L
2026-09-13 · Joel CCC · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kaley Joel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-6
W
2026-09-09 · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Chloe Darden
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-08-23 · Joel CCC · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Chloe Darden
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
L
2026-08-12 · Spradling-CCC · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Georgia Wilson Tindall
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-08-09 · Joel CCC · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kaley Joel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-08-04 · Lusk-CCC · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Tori Gaines
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-3
L
2026-08-02 · Spradling-CCC · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Georgia Wilson Tindall
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-07-27 · Lusk-CCC · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Susan Morgan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 5-7, 0-1
W
2026-07-22 · Spradling-CCC · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Susan Morgan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-17 · Lusk-CCC · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mary Jeffreys
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 2-6, 1-0
L
2025-11-13 · Moseley-CCC · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2025-11-11 · Moseley-CCC · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
Teams43 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
2.5
80%
20W–5L · 59% of games
3.0
66.7%
10W–5L · 55.1% of games
3.5
75%
12W–4L · 58.1% of games
4.0
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.5
87.5%
14W–2L · 70.2% of games
7.5
62.5%
5W–3L · 57% of games
3.5mixed
80%
8W–2L · 62.4% of games
6.0mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 47% of the time
#1 Doubles
47%
45 matches
#2 Doubles
41%
39 matches
#3 Doubles
6%
6 matches
#1 Singles
3%
3 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match
#3 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams