← Search

Andrea Tabares

Lake Mary, FL
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
94 matches · 60W–34L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Andrea Tabares to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history94 matches
L
2026-02-16 · USTA Campus-Luter-TennisCloud/RTT · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amy Morris
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
Ella Simsek / Michelle Ford
2026-02-07 · #2 Doubles · with Jean Krejci championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
W
2026-02-02 · USTA Campus-Luter-TennisCloud/RTT · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Shara Lee
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-02-01 · #2 Doubles · with Maria Alfonzo championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
W
Ann Biever / Wendy Dingwall
2026-01-31 · #1 Doubles · with Jean Krejci championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-01-19 · USTA Campus-Luter-TennisCloud/RTT · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-01-12 · USTA Campus-Luter-TennisCloud/RTT · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jean Krejci
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-01-05 · USTA Campus-Luter-TennisCloud/RTT · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jean Krejci
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2025-12-01 · TennisCloud/RTT-Luter. · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jean Krejci
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
L
2025-11-17 · TennisCloud/RTT-Luter. · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jean Krejci
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2025-11-04 · TennisCloud/RTT-Luter. · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-6
W
2025-11-03 · TennisCloud/RTT-Luter. · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jean Krejci
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams32 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.0
58.3%
7W–5L · 54.1% of games
3.5
60%
27W–18L · 50.9% of games
5.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.5
66.7%
4W–2L · 60.2% of games
7.5
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
66.7%
6W–3L · 51.7% of games
8.0mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 38% of the time
#2 Doubles
38%
36 matches
#1 Doubles
36%
34 matches
#3 Doubles
12%
11 matches
#1 Singles
10%
9 matches
#2 Singles
4%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal