← Search

Janna Myers

Raleigh, NC
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
60 matches · 39W–21L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Janna Myers to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history60 matches
W
2026-09-02 · Sa.Highsmith40C · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Christina Allen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-08-31 · Ja.Myers18C · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Tacey Hesmer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-08-28 · Sa.Highsmith40C · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Julia Kerr
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-08-24 · Ja.Myers18C · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Ashley Gaylord
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-09 · MYERS · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jessica Swaney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-08-03 · Ja.Myers18C · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Betsy Carr
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 3-6, 0-1
W
Leslie Pickens / Brittanie Pate
2026-08-02 · MYERS · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Carson Schuch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-05-14 · Sa.Highsmith40A · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Betsy Carr
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-04-28 · Ja.Myers18A · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Betsy Carr
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-04-20 · Ja.Myers18A · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Betsy Carr
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
Stacey Jacobs / Suzanne Brown
2026-04-15 · Sa.Highsmith40A · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Julia Kerr
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-03-26 · Sa.Highsmith40A · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jillian Good
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams23 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
2.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.0
72.2%
13W–5L · 60.1% of games
3.5
62.5%
5W–3L · 52.4% of games
5.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
5.5
80%
4W–1L · 62.9% of games
6.5
50%
8W–8L · 50.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 47% of the time
#3 Doubles
47%
28 matches
#2 Doubles
37%
22 matches
#1 Doubles
15%
9 matches
#1 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert