← Search

Kari Knoblauch

Raleigh, NC
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
184 matches · 114W–70L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Kari Knoblauch to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history184 matches
L
2026-09-09 · Ma.Zimardo40C · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Denise Turner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-08-31 · Cr.Smith18C6.5 · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Anna Kouba
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 7-5
L
2026-08-15 · Cr.Smith18C6.5 · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Sarah Maynard
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-7, 0-1
L
Jennifer Taylor / Dianna Erwin
2026-08-12 · Ma.Zimardo40C · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Holly Camak
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-06 · Ma.Zimardo18S · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
W
2026-08-03 · Cr.Smith18C6.5 · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Emy Hanson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-07-30 · Ma.Zimardo18S · #3 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
L
2026-05-26 · #1 Doubles · with Emy Hanson championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-05-14 · De.Turner40A · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-12 · Zo.Whitesell40A · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Emy Hanson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-05-12 · #1 Doubles · with Emy Hanson championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-0, 1-0
L
2026-05-11 · De.Turner40A · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams44 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
2.5
79.2%
19W–5L · 63.6% of games
3.0
73.8%
62W–22L · 61.3% of games
3.5
29.4%
5W–12L · 41.5% of games
5.0
60%
3W–2L · 55.9% of games
5.5
53.8%
7W–6L · 51.7% of games
6.5
37.5%
9W–15L · 47.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 25% of the time
#1 Singles
25%
45 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
40 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
39 matches
#1 Doubles
15%
28 matches
#2 Singles
13%
24 matches
#3 Singles
4%
8 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe