← Search

Jennifer Tarnasky

Springdale, AR
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
37 matches · 21W–16L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Jennifer Tarnasky to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history37 matches
W
2026-07-29 · Salmon/Rogers/FAC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Beth Armstrong
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-07-22 · Salmon/Rogers/FAC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Merideth Richards
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-07-20 · Salmon/Rogers/FAC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Robin Wise
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-2
W
2026-06-30 · Salmon/Rogers/FAC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Laura Sandlin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-06-17 · Salmon/Rogers/FAC · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Michele Senlikci
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
Natalie Anderson / Mandy Shelton
2026-06-15 · Salmon/Rogers/FAC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Robin Wise
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-3
L
2026-05-04 · Tarnasky/Springdale/FAC · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-05-02 · Tarnasky/Springdale/FAC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Anne Thomas Madsen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-6
L
2026-04-24 · Riley/Elkins/FAC · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-04-12 · Tarnasky/Springdale/FAC · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Natalie Anderson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-6
W
2026-04-06 · Riley/Elkins/FAC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Yulia McClelland
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-4
L
2026-03-13 · Tarnasky/Springdale/FAC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Yulia McClelland
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 5-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams17 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5
65.2%
15W–8L · 54.5% of games
4.0
37.5%
3W–5L · 44.2% of games
4.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 32% of the time
#1 Doubles
32%
12 matches
#1 Singles
30%
11 matches
#2 Doubles
16%
6 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
5 matches
#2 Singles
8%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova